Skip to main content

Accounting plague


 When King David numbered the people of Israel, the consequence was a plague. In our excessively moralistic age, we think this is just an arbitrary punishment, because morals are not rooted in reality for us. However, no consequence of sin is ever arbitrary in the Bible.

The move to account for all the fighting men is prideful, but specifically because it is attempting to set up a totalising system, something that totally accounts for fighting strength in Israel. Pride, in essence, is the drive for self-sufficiency apart from God.


When you attempt to create a totalising system, however, you cannot explain everything. There are things that don't fit, that pose a question to your system - how do I fit in? As the system moves to accommodate these anomalies, it becomes more fragile. In addition, the pile of questions grows larger. At some point, the system has to collapse, because it can no longer handle the exceptions, resulting in social confusion. It's also worth noting that in the chaos, new systems are born: the world is always changed after a plague.


In the pre-modern world, social unrest of any kind could be described as a plague (similar to the way a flood was used), because a plague is most evident in the impacts on social life.


Thus, we can see that the plague as a consequence of an accounting move fits with the pattern of self-sufficiency collapsing into social disorder, or plague.


Today, we can see COVID also plays to this pattern. Our modern society has made accounting moves that are unrivalled in history, and the natural result is, at some point, a plague. More evident than the natural consequences of the disease are the social measures taken to combat it, and it occurs at a time when social fragmentation is at a high. This is what we might call a 'symbolism happens' moment, where events combine in surprisingly coherent ways.


Incidentally, this is why Apollo is the god of the sun and reason, but also why he visits plagues on people. In addition, the arrow is a symbol of both meanings being noticed, something being pointed out, but also an image of destructive plague.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review of "The Language of Creation" by Matthieu Pageau

The problem we face today (and the problem that nearly all my reading, thinking and writing is centred on) is how to be the Church in the face of modernism. This was a really important book for me and I hope this essay goes some way to explaining why. I will say at the outset that I am simplifying here: pre-modern conceptions of the universe have persisted in the West, but nevertheless, the general trend has been towards abandoning such perspectives, and I am concerned with the overall downward trend, not exceptions. The general problem can be called scientism, that is, that matter is all there is, and thus the scientific method defines all there is to know. This is our basic outlook, and it manifests itself in many different ways, from ideologies as a concept, to consumerism and popular culture. In this way, all metaphysics, religion, spirituality and morality are seen as not based in material reality, and therefore not real, but rather imagined: they are social constructs, complet...
Post a Comment
Read more

My (current) map of reality

This is a highly condensed version of how my map of reality developed; much is left out, and clarity is sacrificed for a packed sentence. My journey began in a tradition that has a deep respect for scripture, especially interpreted 'materialistically' or 'literally'. While there's problems with this, it has the strength of honouring the word of God: I was never persuaded by liberalism, which thinks it knows better than the Bible. My thought has always been that if God has spoken to us through Scripture, perhaps he knows what it means and we don't always, and to hold something in contempt is to place yourself in a position where you cannot understand it. But before I get in really deep, I should explain the basic problem I had, which was essentially a feeling of cognitive dissonance with my experience of the world, knowledge of history, literature, art and science etc, and what the mainline reformed-evangelical protestant church (I will use the word '...
4 comments
Read more

Thinking imagistically

Icon of the Last Judgement by Fr. Luke Dingman Most of the time, we do not think using 'scientific', 'empirical' or 'rational' modes of thought: we do not think axiomatically or with pure logic. The reason is that such modes of approaching reality are extremely expensive: they require a lot of time, thought, rigor, training etc and most people do not have the leisure to learn to think in such ways. Instead, we mostly interact with reality in non-rational ways (not irrational): we attribute and assume cause and effect without 'scientific/empirical evidence'. That is to say, we use the language of story, symbol and imagination to approach reality most of the time. More than that, we make many decisions without fully thinking them through, that is, we make them according to habit or ritual or intuition. The reason, again, is that to think things through completely and in a fully rational way takes time, often more than a lifetime, because reality is comp...
Post a Comment
Read more