Accounting plague

When King David numbered the people of Israel, the consequence was a plague. In our excessively moralistic age, we think this is just an arbitrary punishment, because morals are not rooted in reality for us. However, no consequence of sin is ever arbitrary in the Bible.

The move to account for all the fighting men is prideful, but specifically because it is attempting to set up a totalising system, something that totally accounts for fighting strength in Israel. Pride, in essence, is the drive for self-sufficiency apart from God.

When you attempt to create a totalising system, however, you cannot explain everything. There are things that don't fit, that pose a question to your system - how do I fit in? As the system moves to accommodate these anomalies, it becomes more fragile. In addition, the pile of questions grows larger. At some point, the system has to collapse, because it can no longer handle the exceptions, resulting in social confusion. It's also worth noting that in the chaos, new systems are born: the world is always changed after a plague.

In the pre-modern world, social unrest of any kind could be described as a plague (similar to the way a flood was used), because a plague is most evident in the impacts on social life.

Thus, we can see that the plague as a consequence of an accounting move fits with the pattern of self-sufficiency collapsing into social disorder, or plague.

Today, we can see COVID also plays to this pattern. Our modern society has made accounting moves that are unrivalled in history, and the natural result is, at some point, a plague. More evident than the natural consequences of the disease are the social measures taken to combat it, and it occurs at a time when social fragmentation is at a high. This is what we might call a 'symbolism happens' moment, where events combine in surprisingly coherent ways.

Incidentally, this is why Apollo is the god of the sun and reason, but also why he visits plagues on people. In addition, the arrow is a symbol of both meanings being noticed, something being pointed out, but also an image of destructive plague.

Comments

Review of "The Language of Creation" by Matthieu Pageau

The problem we face today (and the problem that nearly all my reading, thinking and writing is centred on) is how to be the Church in the face of modernism. This was a really important book for me and I hope this essay goes some way to explaining why. I will say at the outset that I am simplifying here: pre-modern conceptions of the universe have persisted in the West, but nevertheless, the general trend has been towards abandoning such perspectives, and I am concerned with the overall downward trend, not exceptions. The general problem can be called scientism, that is, that matter is all there is, and thus the scientific method defines all there is to know. This is our basic outlook, and it manifests itself in many different ways, from ideologies as a concept, to consumerism and popular culture. In this way, all metaphysics, religion, spirituality and morality are seen as not based in material reality, and therefore not real, but rather imagined: they are social constructs, complet

My (current) map of reality

This is a highly condensed version of how my map of reality developed; much is left out, and clarity is sacrificed for a packed sentence. My journey began in a tradition that has a deep respect for scripture, especially interpreted 'materialistically' or 'literally'. While there's problems with this, it has the strength of honouring the word of God: I was never persuaded by liberalism, which thinks it knows better than the Bible. My thought has always been that if God has spoken to us through Scripture, perhaps he knows what it means and we don't always, and to hold something in contempt is to place yourself in a position where you cannot understand it. But before I get in really deep, I should explain the basic problem I had, which was essentially a feeling of cognitive dissonance with my experience of the world, knowledge of history, literature, art and science etc, and what the mainline reformed-evangelical protestant church (I will use the word '

The symbolic structure of 'At the Pike's Behest'

If you come across something strange enough, it will transform your identity. Emelian the fool was a fool and lazy. He was given the chance to better himself by working, but only after some haranguing did he consent to work. His task was to carry water, but when he drew up the water he also drew up a pike. In exchange for not being eaten, the pike said he would grant any wish. And it was so: Emelian wished the buckets to carry themselves home, and they did. In this, we see the ability of a marginal character, the fool, being able to harness chaotic feminine potential, as there is a closeness between the fool and chaos. It is harder for chaos to get the better of the fool because he is too simple, contains too little higher meaning and thus cannot be easily questioned. And so Emelian becomes the identity that directs the potential whereever he desires, and the carrying of water is a perfect representation of this. The choice to eat the fish is analogous to naming it, integrating it in

The Full Creation

Search This Blog