Captain Marvel, postmodernist paradox

Captain Marvel recapitulates stock-standard postmodern storytelling.

To understand this, let us consider that, traditionally, the centre of society is ordered and that the identity ordering it is masculine. This is the structure at the start of the film: the Kree civilisation is clearly masculine, having hyper-organised cities of light. The orderliness hints at a 666 level of organisation (for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qM_kQjpAK6g) and the hexagon space portals echo this also. The main representative of the Kree civilisation we encounter is a white male. In the beginning of the film, the Kree are presented as good.

Opposite this centre of ordered identity, we have the Skrull, who are shape-shifting green aliens. Typically, you expect trouble from such characters, and that is exactly how the film presents them at the beginning.

But then the story turns both these ideas on their heads. It turns out that Captain Marvel has had her memory suppressed by the Kree, as she holds a power they want to use. Not only that, it is an oppressive 'patriarchal' structure personified in Yon-Rogg that keeps her down. It also transpires that the Kree are oppressing the Skrull and essentially trying to eliminate them.

Of course we expect from a massive blockbuster film where the main point is a female superhero to hear all about female empowerment etc. So we get the stereotype of the incompetent male sidekick, flanked by an oppressive male antagonist, and the obligatory omnicompetent female. But the subversions mentioned above also support the main point, which is not just female empowerment, but about ending the masculine (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soh-3jiHq4s). The marginal becomes the centre of empathy and good in the world, which, due to its chaotic nature, tends to be associated with the feminine. Meanwhile, the centre from which identity comes is masculine, and becomes the centre of evil. We thus see Captain Marvel transformed into an angel of light to replace the Kree light city.

Postmodernism is parastic, because it poses a question to the system, but without the system, there is nothing to question (https://thesymbolicworld.com/videos/parasitic-storytelling/). This opens up the possibility of a weird contradiction: Captain Marvel appears masculine even as she destroys it...

Comments

Review of "The Language of Creation" by Matthieu Pageau

The problem we face today (and the problem that nearly all my reading, thinking and writing is centred on) is how to be the Church in the face of modernism. This was a really important book for me and I hope this essay goes some way to explaining why. I will say at the outset that I am simplifying here: pre-modern conceptions of the universe have persisted in the West, but nevertheless, the general trend has been towards abandoning such perspectives, and I am concerned with the overall downward trend, not exceptions. The general problem can be called scientism, that is, that matter is all there is, and thus the scientific method defines all there is to know. This is our basic outlook, and it manifests itself in many different ways, from ideologies as a concept, to consumerism and popular culture. In this way, all metaphysics, religion, spirituality and morality are seen as not based in material reality, and therefore not real, but rather imagined: they are social constructs, complet

My (current) map of reality

This is a highly condensed version of how my map of reality developed; much is left out, and clarity is sacrificed for a packed sentence. My journey began in a tradition that has a deep respect for scripture, especially interpreted 'materialistically' or 'literally'. While there's problems with this, it has the strength of honouring the word of God: I was never persuaded by liberalism, which thinks it knows better than the Bible. My thought has always been that if God has spoken to us through Scripture, perhaps he knows what it means and we don't always, and to hold something in contempt is to place yourself in a position where you cannot understand it. But before I get in really deep, I should explain the basic problem I had, which was essentially a feeling of cognitive dissonance with my experience of the world, knowledge of history, literature, art and science etc, and what the mainline reformed-evangelical protestant church (I will use the word '

The symbolic structure of 'At the Pike's Behest'

If you come across something strange enough, it will transform your identity. Emelian the fool was a fool and lazy. He was given the chance to better himself by working, but only after some haranguing did he consent to work. His task was to carry water, but when he drew up the water he also drew up a pike. In exchange for not being eaten, the pike said he would grant any wish. And it was so: Emelian wished the buckets to carry themselves home, and they did. In this, we see the ability of a marginal character, the fool, being able to harness chaotic feminine potential, as there is a closeness between the fool and chaos. It is harder for chaos to get the better of the fool because he is too simple, contains too little higher meaning and thus cannot be easily questioned. And so Emelian becomes the identity that directs the potential whereever he desires, and the carrying of water is a perfect representation of this. The choice to eat the fish is analogous to naming it, integrating it in

The Full Creation

Search This Blog