Skip to main content

'Pagan' traditions

Image by Jonathan Pageau


Every year, when we celebrate one of the festivals of the Church, articles explaining how some tradition or feast day is really not Christian at all and is just pagan. In many cases, these claims turn out to be false or historically tenuous, put together by people who are just a little too happy to take a jab a Christianity. But in other cases, the festival or tradition does reflect and may have originated from a pagan practice.


The problem with this is at least two-fold. In the first instance, Christians in the early centuries of the church were so careful to keep their faith pure that, for example, they would not even offer a pinch of incense to Caesar at risk of martyrdom. Thus, it seems highly unlikely that such people would appropriate 'pagan' traditions willy-nilly. 


There is also a certain attitude which assumes that Christians had no traditions of their own, nothing to offer the world, and so behaved in a purely parasitic manner. This is manifestly absurd - the Christian story, that Christ ended death, is unique - it is not present in any other culture or religion.


Second, there is an unspoken assumption that traditions are in themselves arbitrary, and legitimacy arises only from chronological primacy: basically, it's all arbitrary, but if you got there first, you're the 'real' deal. This mirrors our fetishization of artists today: someone comes up with a new style and all the imitators are regarded as inferior to the original. The problem with this perspective is that it assumes there is no meaning intrinsic to the world, but rather that it is all imposed. The only true patterns are not those of meaning and relationship, but only of mechanics and physics.


Unfortunately for this point of view, patterns of meaning are basic to intelligibility. Unless there were 'intrinsic' patterns of meaning, nothing in the world would be intelligible. Seeing patterns is thus essential, and you can be better or worse at seeing particular patterns. When you encounter an unknown subject, it appears chaotic and lacking order, until you are introduced to the key or main patterns it follows. Often, people only understand part of a subject, only seeing some of the pattern and go on to make great errors. Therefore, we must see all traditions and festivals as attempts to articulate and participate in particular patterns. Rituals are the compressed re-enactment of a particular pattern of meaning, and festivals are rituals at the social level. More than that, a way of life is an attempt to embody a particular pattern or ideal of humanity: festivals are simply more concentrated points of meaning in life.


Now we can make sense of the claim about the 'pagan' roots of Christian traditions. Pagans are responding to particular ways in which reality is patterned. They see the cycle of the year, the harvest in autumn, the planting in spring and so on, and respond by emphasizing these patterns in festivals. They can see a meaning there and attempt to articulate it. But they didn't see the whole pattern. Pagan religions often have a aimless or tragic end to the world built in (e.g. karma and Ragnarök). They didn't know how to resolve the problem of death, although they tried with such things as sacrifice. Nevertheless, they grasped some elements of the truth. Christianity provided the universal answer to the problem of death. But since Christianity moves from the point, the universal, the Jew out into the world of the every particular Gentile thing, it encounters parts of particular patterns that don't contradict the universal, but indeed, express it. This is the meaning of love, that it permits a lower thing to exist in its own right, so long as it agrees with the universal.


Christianity therefore did not adopt pagan practices on an ad hoc basis. They excised such practices as human sacrifice, orgies and other things that did not fit with Christianity. They contextualized traditions, bringing them in to participate in the wider pattern of the Christianity. Thus Halloween and All Saints can reference the 'fruits' of Autumn, Christmas the turning of the dying day, and Easter the new life of spring. This is part of what is meant by Christ filling all things, and so Christianity becomes the cosmic story that encompasses all of reality.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review of "The Language of Creation" by Matthieu Pageau

The problem we face today (and the problem that nearly all my reading, thinking and writing is centred on) is how to be the Church in the face of modernism. This was a really important book for me and I hope this essay goes some way to explaining why. I will say at the outset that I am simplifying here: pre-modern conceptions of the universe have persisted in the West, but nevertheless, the general trend has been towards abandoning such perspectives, and I am concerned with the overall downward trend, not exceptions. The general problem can be called scientism, that is, that matter is all there is, and thus the scientific method defines all there is to know. This is our basic outlook, and it manifests itself in many different ways, from ideologies as a concept, to consumerism and popular culture. In this way, all metaphysics, religion, spirituality and morality are seen as not based in material reality, and therefore not real, but rather imagined: they are social constructs, complet...

My (current) map of reality

This is a highly condensed version of how my map of reality developed; much is left out, and clarity is sacrificed for a packed sentence. My journey began in a tradition that has a deep respect for scripture, especially interpreted 'materialistically' or 'literally'. While there's problems with this, it has the strength of honouring the word of God: I was never persuaded by liberalism, which thinks it knows better than the Bible. My thought has always been that if God has spoken to us through Scripture, perhaps he knows what it means and we don't always, and to hold something in contempt is to place yourself in a position where you cannot understand it. But before I get in really deep, I should explain the basic problem I had, which was essentially a feeling of cognitive dissonance with my experience of the world, knowledge of history, literature, art and science etc, and what the mainline reformed-evangelical protestant church (I will use the word '...

Review of The Ballad of Buster Scruggs

The Coen brother's Netflix film, The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, moves from the humorous to the profound, but also, as others have pointed out, from a romanticized version of passage to the afterlife to a chillingly serious one. **Spoiler warning** It is beautifully produced. All the scenes are splendidly shot and the acting is perfect. Despite being composed of six stories of varying lengths, the film coheres. The film could firstly be read as a somewhat cynical, albeit well-rounded tribute to the western genre in all its diversity, since the main characters are often anti-heros, and the stories are all haunted by tragedy: the normal order of things is often reversed. However, just as the book of Revelation refers to essentially every book of the Old Testament, but almost never with direct quotes and nearly always with modification and re-contextualization, so the Coen brothers do the same with Westerns, attempting a metareading of the genre. The effect of this technique is to rev...