Immaterial numbers and material reality

Numbers are immaterial.

Numbers are essential for the measurement of physical reality.

All scientific principles and discoveries are based on measurement of physical reality.

If numbers are a human construct, then all scientific discoveries are also.

If reality is only physical, the only means by which you can know this objectively is by immaterial numbers, which is contradictory.

Therefore reality is both material and immaterial.

Comments

Review of "The Language of Creation" by Matthieu Pageau

The problem we face today (and the problem that nearly all my reading, thinking and writing is centred on) is how to be the Church in the face of modernism. This was a really important book for me and I hope this essay goes some way to explaining why. I will say at the outset that I am simplifying here: pre-modern conceptions of the universe have persisted in the West, but nevertheless, the general trend has been towards abandoning such perspectives, and I am concerned with the overall downward trend, not exceptions. The general problem can be called scientism, that is, that matter is all there is, and thus the scientific method defines all there is to know. This is our basic outlook, and it manifests itself in many different ways, from ideologies as a concept, to consumerism and popular culture. In this way, all metaphysics, religion, spirituality and morality are seen as not based in material reality, and therefore not real, but rather imagined: they are social constructs, complet...

My (current) map of reality

This is a highly condensed version of how my map of reality developed; much is left out, and clarity is sacrificed for a packed sentence. My journey began in a tradition that has a deep respect for scripture, especially interpreted 'materialistically' or 'literally'. While there's problems with this, it has the strength of honouring the word of God: I was never persuaded by liberalism, which thinks it knows better than the Bible. My thought has always been that if God has spoken to us through Scripture, perhaps he knows what it means and we don't always, and to hold something in contempt is to place yourself in a position where you cannot understand it. But before I get in really deep, I should explain the basic problem I had, which was essentially a feeling of cognitive dissonance with my experience of the world, knowledge of history, literature, art and science etc, and what the mainline reformed-evangelical protestant church (I will use the word '...

The Scriptures as a Cherub

This post draws heavily, and in some cases directly, from the work of James Jordan, Peter Leithart and Michael Bull, as well as Matthieu and Jonathan Pageau. I would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Jacob Russell, Bradley Heißmann and Eugene Schreder: their conversation provided some of the content, as well as crystallise my thinking. In the Bible and in ancient cosmology, the cherubim are high-ranking angels. In the bible, they are described as having four heads. Moving from the top clockwise and ending at 9 o’clock, these are man, bull/ox, eagle and lion (although see below for how the faces move). As humans, we have six sides (think of a coffin), but four that relate to movement through space, since we cannot fly. This is part of the reason we have four points of the compass (the other reason is, of course, the passage of the sun and moon, which creates a line from east to west across the sky). Thus, the number four and the square is associated with defined space....

The Full Creation

Search This Blog